New York Science Journal
(N Y Sci J)
ISSN 1554-0200 (print); ISSN 2375-723X (online),
doi prefix: 10.7537, Monthly
Volume 17 -
Number 7 (Cumulated No. 185);
July
25, 2024
Cover
(jpg),
Cover
(pdf),
Introduction,
Contents,
Call for
Papers,
nys1707
The following manuscripts are presented as online first for peer-review, starting from July 2, 2024.
All comments are welcome; you may email us at editor@sciencepub.net, or contact the authors directly.
You can use
the message in end of the article abstract to cite it.
To get Microsoft
Documents: After you open the "Full Text" for each article,
change the last 3 characters of the web address from .pdf to
.doc (or .docx)
When you submit manuscript(s), please mention that it is
submitted to New York Science Journal
http://www.sciencepub.net/nature; newyorksci@sciencepub.net
Marsland Press, 310 W 18th
Street, New York, NY 10011, USA.
718-404-5362, 347-321-7172
CONTENTS
No.
|
Titles /
Authors /Abstracts
|
Full Text
|
No.
|
1
|
Assessment Of Bacterial Enteropathogens Of Effluent From Wupa
Sewage Treatment Plant On the Surrounding Water Body
1Adayi,
Florence Iyaji and 2Ijigbade Bamidele
Department of Microbiology, University of Abuja, P.M.B. 117,
Abuja, Nigeria
Email:
florenceadayi@yahoo.com1
deleijigbade@yahoo.com2
Abstract:
Fifteen (15) water samples were collected from Wupa river, with
five (5) each from the upstream, downstream and point of
effluent discharge into the river and screened for the presence
of enteropathogens. Results of the total aerobic bacterial loads
upstream ranged from 1.06×109±0.20 Cfu/ml to 1.23×109±0.21
Cfu/ml while the coliform ranges from 2.65×108±0.21
Cfu/ml to 2.9×108±0.28 Cfu/ml. However, the total
aerobic bacterial loads at the point of effluent discharge to
the River range from 8.20×108±0.28 Cfu/ml to 9.40×108±0.22
Cfu/ml while the coliform ranges from 2.10×107±0.11
Cfu/ml to 2.40×107±0.14 Cfu/ml. A total of
thirty-nine (39) enteropathogens belonging to six bacterial
genera and six species were isolated from this study and they
are Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella
typhimurium,
Proteus mirabilis,
Klebsiella pneumonia,
Enterobacter cloacae
and
Oblitimonas alkaliphila.
Ten bacterial isolates belonging to five strains were isolated
from the upstream station of Wupa River which was nine (9)
enteropathogens belonging to five (5) strains were isolated from
the point of effluent discharge to the river while, the
downstream of wupa river after effluent discharge point recorded
the highest number of enteropathogens of twenty (20) with eight
(8) strains of bacteria isolates. Escherichia coli was
the most frequently isolated bacteria which represented 25.64%,
followed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae
which represented 15.38% of the total isolates.
Salmonella enterica
serovars Eko EQAS2016S1 was 12.81% while
Proteus mirabilis
RCFS3, Salmonella Typhimurium FDAARGOS_319,
Oblitimonas alkaliphila E1148 and
Enterobacter cloacae
EMP 13-3 recorded 10.26% each, whereas
Proteus mirabilis
ALK044 recorded 5.13 % being the least number of isolated
bacteria. Although the bacteria isolated from the downstream was
significantly high (P≥ 0.05), yet there was no significantly
difference (P≤ 0.05) between the bacteria load isolated from the
upstream and downstream as well as that of the effluent
discharged into the river. However, there is an urgent need for
for proper treatment, management, monitoring and sanitation of
the effluent to avoid the transfer of enteropathogenic bacteria
into the receiving water body.
[Adayi,
Florence Iyaji and Ijigbade Bamidele.
Assessment Of Bacterial
Enteropathogens Of Effluent From Wupa Sewage Treatment Plant On
the Surrounding Water Body.
N Y Sci J
2024;17(7):1-7].
ISSN
1554-0200 (print); ISSN 2375-723X (online).
http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork.
01.doi:10.7537/marsnys170724.01.
Keywords:
Wupa River, Effluent, Enteropathogens |
Full Text |
1
|
2
|
Industrial Food
Processing Wastewater Treatment by Anaerobic/Anoxic/Aerobic
Configuration in Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR).
Mostafa M.Emara1,
2, Ahmed M.A.Abd El-Razek3and Amir
A.M.SayedAhmed4, 5
(1)
Chemistry
Department, Faculty of Science (boys) , Al-Azhar University
(2)
Science Center for Detection and Remediation of Environmental
Hazards (SCDREH), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
(3) Basic science Department, Higher institute of
Engineering and Technology, King Marriot-Alexandria.
(4) Masterstudent in Chemistry Department, Faculty of
Science (boys) Al-Azhar University.
(5) Chemist at central lab of ElGarbya Water and
Wastewater Company
Corresponding Author:chemist.amir@yahoo.com
Abstract:
Industrial wastewater is one of the important pollution sources
in the pollution of the water environment. Effluent streams from
food processing may have a high biochemical and chemical oxygen
demand (BOD and COD) resulting from organic wastes entering into
the wastewater stream, and from the use of chemicals and
detergents in various processes including cleaning. In addition,
effluent may contain pathogenic bacteria, pesticide residues,
suspended and dissolved solids such as fibers and soil
particles, nutrients and microbes, and variable pH.
In
this study, experiments have been conducted to evaluate the
pollution in industrial food wastewater and treated by using new
technique, samples were collected during 2016 from the raw
wastewater of
Senyoreta
potatoes and
snacks factory in Tanta,
El Gharbya governorate, Egypt. The samples were analyzed
following standard procedures for the determination of: chemical
oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total
suspended solids (TSS), total nitrogen (Total-N) and total
phosphorus and other parameters. The results indicated that the
quality of wastewater is very high concentrated with pollutants.
The pilot plant was designed to perform treatment with high
efficiency removal so we constructed modified MBBR process.
[Mostafa
M.Emara, Ahmed M.A.Abd El-Razek and Amir A.M.SayedAhmed.
Industrial Food Processing Wastewater Treatment by
Anaerobic/Anoxic/Aerobic Configuration in Moving Bed Biofilm
Reactor (MBBR).
N Y Sci J
2024;17(7):8-13].
ISSN
1554-0200 (print); ISSN 2375-723X (online).
http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork.
02.
doi:10.7537/marsnys170724.02.
Keywords:
Industrial food
processing wastewater, moving
bed biofilm reactor (MBBR), biological nutrient removal |
Full Text |
2
|
3
|
Species Richness
and Diversity of Insects in an Agro-ecosystem in Bhabar region
of Uttarakhand
Deepika Goswami1,
Rekha* 2 and Vishal Singh3
Department of
Zoology, Kumaun University, Nainital-263002, India
1Email:
deepikagoswami22@gmail.com
Abstract:
Background:
Species richness
and diversity of insects were investigated in an agro-ecosystem
in Bhabar region of Uttarakhand from March 2018 to February
2020. Results: In total, 992 individuals were collected
representing 7 orders (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera,
Hymenoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera and Odonata), 30 families and
91 species that included herbivores, predators, omnivores and
saprophages. The most dominant order was Lepidoptera with a
relative abundance of (46.15%) and, the least was Diptera
(6.59%). The five most abundant families by numbers of
individuals were Pieridae (14.8%), Nymphalidae (13.9%),
Lycaenidae (6.1%), Papilionidae (5.9%), and Libellulidfae
(5.4%). The five most diverse families by species were
Nymphalidae (13), Pieridae (9), Lycaenidae (8), Papilionidae
(7), and Libellulidae (6). Conclusions: The diversity
index showed significant Diversity (Hʹ=1.832), Evenness
(E=0.9449) and Margalef species richness (d=2.076) of insect
fauna. Diversity indices of insect orders showed that
Lepidoptera was the most diverse (Hʹ=1.641), Dipterans had
highest Evenness (E=0.9449), and Coleopterans had the maximum
species richness Margalef’s Index (d=2.056). There were 720
individuals of insect pollinators visitors were observed, which
belonged to 62 species in 4 orders (Lepidoptera, Coleoptera,
Hymenoptera, and Hemiptera).
[Deepika Goswami,
Rekha and Vishal Singh. Species Richness and Diversity of
Insects in an Agro-ecosystem in Bhabar region of Uttarakhand.
N Y Sci J
2024;17(7):14-23].
ISSN
1554-0200 (print); ISSN 2375-723X (online).
http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork.
03.doi:10.7537/marsnys170724.03.
Keywords
Species diversity, Species abundance, Shannon Index (Hʹ),
Pollinators/Visitors, agro-ecosystem |
Full Text |
3
|
4
|
2022 Updated
Report of Monsoons and Australian Monsoon Time Scale
Gangadhara Rao
Irlapati
H.No.5-30-4/1,
Saibabanagar, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, India-500055
Email:
gangadhar19582058@gmail.com
Google/Phone pay
A/C No. +91 630 557 1833
Abstract:
Australian monsoon is a
key system in global monsoon systems. I have conducted many
scientific researches on this monsoon system and as a part
these researches, I proposed and designed the Basics of
Australian Monsoon Time Scale which can help to study the past,
present and future movements and conditions of the Australian
monsoon. In the current year 2022, the pre-path of Indian summer
monsoon was traveling upwards and reached to the 29th June.
Below this, the main-path of Indian summer monsoon also traveled
upwards parallel to the pre-path of Indian summer monsoon with a
difference of about 30 days and reached to the 29th July, As it
moves further up, changes in the climate are likely increasing
and there are more chances of heavy rains and floods in the
coming years.
[Gangadhara Rao
Irlapati.
2022 Updated Report
of Monsoons and Australian Monsoon Time Scale.
N Y Sci J
2024;17(7):24-151]. ISSN 1554-0200
(print); ISSN 2375-723X (online).
http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork.
04.
doi:10.7537/marsnys170724.04.
Keywords:
Global Monsoons Time Scales, North American Monsoon Time Scale,
North African Monsoon Time Scale, Indian Monsoons Time Scale,
East Asian Monsoon Time Scale, Western North Pacific Monsoon
Time Scale, South American Monsoon Time Scale, South African
Monsoon Time Scale, Australian Monsoon Time Scale, European
Monsoon Time Scale. |
Full Text |
4
|
The manuscripts in
this issue were presented as online first for peer-review,
starting from July 2, 2024.
All comments are
welcome: newyorksci@sciencepub.net.
For back issues of the
New York
Science Journal, click
here.
Emails: newyorksci@sciencepub.net;
editor@sciencepub.net
Website: http://www.sciencepub.net/newyork
|